Moira McQueen, LLB, MDiv, PhD
It is somewhat perplexing that, after years of education and public health warnings about cigarette smoking, any government would then introduce the legalization of cannabis and be permissive towards the use of vaping products, mostly e-cigarettes. One reason could have been the foreseen increased revenue from taxation of such products, but another reason was that the cost of policing cannabis use put severe stress on police budgets for an offence that society no longer deems serious, and which in any event was not very effective.
There were and are black market and criminal elements at work, especially where cannabis is concerned, and society would like to have these removed. It is unclear that legalization of cannabis is the best way to do so, since legalized markets are being undercut by those elements, while, at the same time, legitimation seems to have caused more use and, correspondingly, more addiction problems.
If there are more users, then revenue gained from taxation could be offset by treatment costs, as more people’s health becomes affected. There will be costs of protecting minors through public health and educational campaigns, just as in previous anti-smoking campaigns. More users mean a likely increase in accidents and injuries, adding to already strained health care costs.
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) extracted from the resin found in the glands of cannabis plants is responsible for most of the psychological effects sought by those who use any form of cannabis recreationally. Marijuana comes from the dried flowers and buds of the plant, and is smoked or inhaled as a vapour.
Cannabinoid receptors are concentrated in our brains and are associated with thinking, memory, pleasure, coordination and time perception. THC stimulates the brain to release dopamine, and this contributes to the euphoria experienced, the “high” that is sought, with effects lasting up to two hours. People taking medical marijuana are, therefore, instructed not to drive afterwards until they can assess their own tolerance of the drug. It is important to note that cannabis taken to relieve some medical conditions is in its own legal category and was allowed before the broader legalization of cannabis in 2019.
Some listed effects of using cannabinoids include the possibility of hallucinations, changes in thinking, or delusions caused by interference with the hippocampus, which is needed for processing information. Use can trigger relapse in schizophrenic symptoms and affect motor skills for perhaps three hours.
Longer term studies at CAMH show that regular use of cannabis is associated with depression or anxiety; there is a higher rate of injury and risk of death from more vehicle collisions; there are demonstrated causal effects re schizophrenia, chronic bronchitis and lung cancer. It is not clear how much cannabis has to be consumed for impairment, which is hard to gauge, while at the same time roadside testing is experiencing some practical difficulties.
In terms of priorities, society needs to pay more attention to cannabis use and vaping by young people. There are definite health ethics concerns for youth, given the rising numbers of users of both cannabis and vaping products. Here are some factors about cannabis use that are not well known:
The Canadian Paediatric Society is concerned about these rates and provided evidence to Health Canada, pre-legalization, about the effects of cannabis on youth:
The Society underlined the fact that the amount of problematic TCH in cannabis (delta-9 –tetrahydrocannabinol) is currently two to four times higher than before. It emphasizes the detrimental effects of use on brain plasticity in youth, since brains are not fully formed until about age 25, much older than people realize. The Society points out a further concern: when cannabis use is combined with alcohol and tobacco, it triples the risk of health issues, and the risk of dependence (addiction) grows where two or three such substances are at work.
It is estimated that one in six adolescents who use cannabis will meet the criteria for dependence, and two new diagnoses reflect these developments: Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) based on observation of functional impairment, is shown in reduced academic performance/truancy/reduced participation in extracurricular activities/conflict with family and so on. The second is Cannabis Withdrawal Symptom (CWS), shown by the presence of irritability/anxiety/depressed mood/ sleep disturbance/serious changes in appetite, etc.
A major concern for parents is teen driving, and they should be aware that cannabis-impaired driving is more prevalent among adolescents than alcohol-impaired driving. In 2015, 9.8 students in Ontario (Grades 10-12) admitted to driving after cannabis use at least once during the previous year. This is compounded by the fact that road side testing is still problematic and that cannabis-infused edibles can take up to six hours to show effects. Young people may not even know that they are impaired.
“Vaping is the act of inhaling and exhaling an aerosol produced by a vaping product…Vaping doesn’t require burning like cigarette smoking…” The long-term health impacts of vaping are unknown. There is enough evidence to justify efforts to prevent the use of vaping products by youth and non-smokers, and the Canadian government is aware of this. Provincial laws regulate age, so that in Ontario, one must be 19 to buy cannabis and vaping products. This does not appear to take the warning of possible dangers to brain plasticity stated by the Canadian Paediatric Society at all seriously.
In any event, whether a young person is thirteen or twenty-three, the most important point about e-cigarettes is that they contain nicotine, and no amount of fancy flavourings should be allowed to disguise this factor. It is thought that smoking e-cigarettes is preferable to smoking “real” cigarettes, to wean people off nicotine. Recent adverts sponsored by the tobacco industry extol the virtues of e-cigarettes in themselves and for their use in providing addicted smokers with a cigarette with a lower level of nicotine. That may be true in those cases, but we are still talking about nicotine use, and it is dangerous for marketers to suggest that e-cigarettes are harmless or even beneficial: they may be less harmful for adults than full scale cigarettes, but the point for youth is surely to discourage smoking entirely and not expose them to the possibility of addiction to any level of nicotine in the first place! There is a strong ethical need for government and public health to work to make this clear and not permit adult advertising campaigns that could confuse young people about the facts. The health effects in the two situations are completely different and must not be conflated.
Canada Health now has several websites dedicated to cannabis and vaping products, with specific information for parents and for youth. Educational programs are available and underway in schools. Legislation specifically prohibits those under the age of 18/19 from buying any of these products, but user statistics tell a different story, and young people need to be protected by those closest to them. Legislation can only do so much and parents must make sure they are informed to help their children understand the larger picture involved in using these products.
The Globe and Mail recently reported that “The Ontario government is moving to ban most flavoured vaping products from convenience stores and gas stations and to cap nicotine levels in a bid to prevent young people from using e-cigarettes.” In December 2019, the federal government announced it would ban most forms of e-cigarette advertising that young people could see, including on social media, and it has promised new flavour restrictions this year. The Globe and Mail notes: “Under the current federal law, companies cannot promote e-cigarette flavours that could appeal to youth, such as candy, dessert or soft drink flavours.” Such use has not yet been banned, but societal concerns about youth choices could impel a change in legislation, however slow.
Health Canada clearly states the risks to both adult and youth from cannabis and e-cigarettes, and educational material is being used in schools and elsewhere. Our youth need to be informed and protected, and it would be a true health breakthrough if they could recognize the wisdom of a statement made by an expert from the University of Alberta who summed it up pretty well in saying: “Nothing inhaled outside of prescribed and tested inhalational medications is safe for your lungs…Your lungs are meant for respiration.”
Moira McQueen, LLB, MDiv, PhD, is the Director of the Canadian
Catholic Bioethics Institute. She teaches moral theology in the Faculty of
Theology, University of St. Michael’s College.
Download: Health Ethics Concerns over Cannabis Use and Vaping – Moira McQueen, LLB, MDiv, PhD